Comments on: Introducing Orc http://www.schleef.org/blog/2008/05/23/introducing-orc/ Just another WordPress weblog Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:15:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 By: Ogg Vorbis and Maemo 5; technical standpoint « Webcitizen FelipeC http://www.schleef.org/blog/2008/05/23/introducing-orc/#comment-1125 Ogg Vorbis and Maemo 5; technical standpoint « Webcitizen FelipeC Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:05:28 +0000 http://www.schleef.org/blog/2008/05/23/introducing-orc/#comment-1125 [...] citizen; it won’t drain the battery (if properly optimized). GCC optimizations and Orc runtime compiler can be used, or the traditional manual [...] […] citizen; it won’t drain the battery (if properly optimized). GCC optimizations and Orc runtime compiler can be used, or the traditional manual […]

]]> By: Passing on the Left » Blog Archive » Random Updates http://www.schleef.org/blog/2008/05/23/introducing-orc/#comment-1086 Passing on the Left » Blog Archive » Random Updates Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:18:03 +0000 http://www.schleef.org/blog/2008/05/23/introducing-orc/#comment-1086 [...] at this annoying stage with Orc and Liboil where I need to add a feature to Liboil to support a new feature in Schrödinger, except [...] […] at this annoying stage with Orc and Liboil where I need to add a feature to Liboil to support a new feature in Schrödinger, except […]

]]> By: admin http://www.schleef.org/blog/2008/05/23/introducing-orc/#comment-1006 admin Sat, 24 May 2008 02:40:10 +0000 http://www.schleef.org/blog/2008/05/23/introducing-orc/#comment-1006 It's not entirely clear from the text that orc is part of the liboil source. It’s not entirely clear from the text that orc is part of the liboil source.

]]> By: admin http://www.schleef.org/blog/2008/05/23/introducing-orc/#comment-1002 admin Fri, 23 May 2008 20:43:25 +0000 http://www.schleef.org/blog/2008/05/23/introducing-orc/#comment-1002 llvm: LLVM is a good tool, and a very general version of what Orc does. However, I was not able to get it to produce code that was as fast as liboil code. In addition, Orc is much more extensible in the exact areas I need and I think other people need. As much as I dislike NIH syndrome, this project definitely borders on it. My defense is that I now have a working runtime compiler with features I need, rather than still attempting to hack those features onto LLVM. llvm: LLVM is a good tool, and a very general version of what Orc does. However, I was not able to get it to produce code that was as fast as liboil code. In addition, Orc is much more extensible in the exact areas I need and I think other people need.

As much as I dislike NIH syndrome, this project definitely borders on it. My defense is that I now have a working runtime compiler with features I need, rather than still attempting to hack those features onto LLVM.

]]> By: llvm http://www.schleef.org/blog/2008/05/23/introducing-orc/#comment-996 llvm Fri, 23 May 2008 20:23:18 +0000 http://www.schleef.org/blog/2008/05/23/introducing-orc/#comment-996 Did you consider LLVM? It is used by Apple and others for the type of dynamic code specialization you are describing. The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure http://llvm.org/ Did you consider LLVM?

It is used by Apple and others for the type of dynamic code specialization you are describing.

The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
http://llvm.org/

]]>